The new video "A Grave Injustice" is available on his website This new documentary has a very accurate description of how the 1988 Carbon C14 dating was done and why it seems biased from the very beginning, almost like it was a plot to prove that the Shroud is a fake.In 2005 January 20 a paper was published in the professional journal, ‘Thermo Chimica Acta’ by Dr.And now we even know that the shroud could have been in Jerusalem in 33 AD.
- dating weatherby vanguard
- jamaican dating personals
- draw down the moon dating agency
- Instant messaging sex chat
- in rowupdating event in
- senior dating sites arlington va
- the rules of the dating game
If queried for their opinion about the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin, probably 9 out of every 10 people would essentially say the same thing — carbon testing performed in 1988 clearly proved that the religious artifact was nothing more than a brilliantly conceived fraud.
I can’t say that I find fault with the Shroud’s critics, because I’ve seen the same evidence.
Instead, Rogers found powerful evidence suggesting Benford and Marino had been absolutely correct in saying the material for the original carbon dating tests had been taken from a contaminated section of the shroud, identifying cotton fibers in the sample not found in the rest of the shroud.
He proposed testing the scorch marks on the shroud for more accurate carbon dating.
The results from all 3 labs said that the cloth was dated between the years 12.